Search for: "Best v. Best" Results 5481 - 5500 of 41,835
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2021, 4:03 am by Mario Machado
In an Order on Guidelines Calculations in the case of U.S. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 7:55 am by Flora Vineberg
Notably, this case highlights best practices for employers: to take employee wishes and concerns with respect to their own pronouns, identities, and gender expressions seriously. [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 6:00 am by CMS
So I think on this I would adopt the words of Chief Justice Holt, in the great case of Coggs v Barnard in 1703, when he said: “I have stirred these points, which wiser heads in time may settle. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 1:14 pm
 Secondly, and even more importantly, In Summerfield v. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 11:22 am by Emily Coward
We are grateful for Emily’s many contributions while at the School of Government and wish her all the best in her new endeavors. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 7:52 am by Jonathan H. Adler
In the Wall Street Journal, Chris Jacobs argues that this violates conditional spending holding of NFIB v. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 7:56 am by Alvaro Marañon, Stephanie Pell
” Accordingly, the guidance provides a summary of the relevant sanctions requirements, best compliance practices and other resources aimed at helping exchanges mitigate these risks. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 5:00 am by Eric Segall
This blog post ignores the issue, however, because it has little bearing in the real world and the position is absurd, especially for a Justice who thought judges should try to ascertain the original public meaning of the ancient words of the United States Constitution by looking at sources such as the Federalist Papers.We should move on from the textualist-versus-purposivist battles because, to put it simply, judges should use all relevant information to try and ascertain the meaning of statutory… [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 1:30 am by Renatka Behan
In fact, the court may request a specific welfare report to address section 1(3) of the welfare checklist, following the cases of Dawson v Wearmouth [1999] and the case of AB v BB and Others [2013] EWHC 227 (Fam). [read post]