Search for: "Matter of Mark S." Results 121 - 140 of 26,726
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2024, 4:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
At least one of the employees first added the marking to their apron at about the same time as the perpetrator’s trial and related protests. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 8:31 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
” J.A. 8.As to burdens-->“The determination that a mark comprises scandalous matter is a conclusion of law based upon underlying factual inquiries. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:38 pm
Next question: does it matter which Board of Appeal hears your case when it comes to the distinctiveness inquiry under Article 7(1)(b)? [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 3:01 am
 The judge in the matter has scheduled a hearing in February regarding the issue of whether a trade mark forfeiture order in the case exceeded the Government’s constitutional boundaries and offended the Mongols’ First Amendment rights. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 7:18 pm by Wells Bennett
Military Commissions Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins released a statement following the completion of yesterday’s hearing in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 4:53 am
Therefore, it gives plenary review to the TTAB's legal conclusions, and reviews the Board's findings of fact under the substantial evidence standard.The CAFC asserted that "the Board concentrated its analysis on the difference between the stylized letter 'I' in Chi Institute's mark, and the word 'PLUS' in Wang's mark, and held that the marks are 'distinguished by their respective… [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 11:50 am by Nicholas J. Krob
” Included with this Amendment was a specimen purporting to show applicant’s use of the mark in commerce—a low resolution image of a white t-shirt with the phrase “WHITE LIVES MATTER” printed on the front and on a tag. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 8:00 am by Tucker Chambers
However, the Board emphasized that “no matter how hard a company attempts to make an inherently nondistinctive word or symbol serve as a unique source identifier, it is proof of results—that consumers so perceive the purported mark—that is the touchstone of our inquiry into acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 8:00 am by Tucker Chambers
However, the Board emphasized that “no matter how hard a company attempts to make an inherently nondistinctive word or symbol serve as a unique source identifier, it is proof of results—that consumers so perceive the purported mark—that is the touchstone of our inquiry into acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 2:46 am by Jan Jacobi
On the basis of this burden, a claimant must set out, in a substantiated manner, the matters intended to show non-use of the mark. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 7:39 am
" It agreed with the Board's conclusion that "a likelihood of confusion between the marks could not exist as a matter of law, even when taking all of the other DuPont factors to weigh in favor of opposer. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 12:27 pm
To make matters even more interesting, the litigation is somewhat a family affair.Harry Winston Inc. was founded by Mr. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 4:15 am by Afro Leo
Moreover, the band’s Wikipedia page stated that the band’s name is “derived from an ethnic slur for Asians. [read post]
30 May 2013, 2:01 am by Jeremy
 Other issues that piqued my interest (and not necessarily raised in IPLAN’s suit) include: Is the accreditation an appropriate proof of expertise in trade mark matters, given that the requirements for accreditation are minimal and not even verified? [read post]
Nefarious individuals who are looking for easy marks typically target people who they perceive to be vulnerable. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 12:50 pm by neli
” LII donor Mark D. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 1:52 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Mark Killenbeck, author of several excellent legal histories, including one on M’Culloch v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 11:15 am by The Settlement Channel
Mark's answer is that the structured settlement brand name has been taken over by the factoring profession and that it is now going to be almost impossible to salvage the integrity of the product in the minds of consumers. [read post]