Search for: "United States v. Bayer"
Results 81 - 100
of 294
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
Bayer Corp., 727 F.3d 300 (3d Cir. 2013), and Marcus v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 5:32 am
”Bayer Consumer Care AG v. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 3:00 am
In 2006, the USDA announced that the rice supply in the United States had been contaminated by Bayer’s genetically modified rice. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Best v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 5:56 am
McCrary v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 8:48 am
American Lung Association v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 7:44 am
(affirming a finding of direct infringement where a jury“could have reasonably concluded that . . . more likelythan not one person somewhere in the United States hadperformed the claimed method”); see also Broadcom Corp.v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
" Further, said the court, "The fact that causes of action may be stated separately, invoke different legal theories, or seek different relief will not permit relitigation of claims," citing Pondview Corp. v Blatt, 95 AD3d 980.The test applied to determine if an action is ripe for application of the doctrine of res judicata is a pragmatic one, involving an analysis of how the facts are related as to time, space, origin or motivation, whether they form a convenient… [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 4:35 pm
What if Bayer started using FLANAX in the United States. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Md. 2012) (same); New York State Pesticide Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 5:25 am
United State ex rel. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:59 pm
Bayer Corp., 131 S.Ct. 2368 (2011). [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 6:53 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
In the consultation report of the neurologist states: “Neurontin is wholly appropriate in this patient. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 10:40 pm
”ProtectionismWhat she forgot to mention is that the United States routinely issues such licences, albeit through their courts which refuse to grant patent injunctions on grounds of public interest. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 1:34 pm
Mensing case was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) on June 23, 2011. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 5:21 am
Moreno v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 1:35 pm
YAZ and Yasmin are "brand-name" drugs made and sold by Bayer. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Surgidev Corp., 899 P.2d 576, 591 (N.M. 1995) (“evidence of compliance with FDA regulations was properly submitted to the jury for consideration”); United Blood Services v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 7:34 am
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. [read post]
